Showing posts with label West-Eastern Divan Orchestra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label West-Eastern Divan Orchestra. Show all posts

Saturday, 28 July 2012

Barenboim wins Gold, Beethoven, Olympics

Daniel Barenboim wins gold! Magnificent Beethoven 9th at BBC Prom 18. Beethoven's monument to tolerance, with the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, and what they stand for : who could fail to be moved?  This was an act of faith. Whether or not music can change the world, we don't know, but if we don't believe in hope, we might as well give up.

Of course much of the appeal was  emotional. Who could not fail to be moved by the symbolism?  The finest moments came when the choruses broke into song. It was better that they were carried away with enthusiasm: much better this heartfelt freedom than polished perfection. The chorus on this occasion represented the world, voices of all kinds united for a shared ideal. Everything else fades into insignificance. This was a Prom that will live forever in history.

Perhaps the unconsionable Zil lanes served a purpose, for this time they were ferrying Barenboim, a genuine hero, to the Olympic stadium, rather than corporate freeloaders. Opening ceremonies of the Olympics are supposed to be grandiose to the point of crass, so there's no point in analysing this comic book rebranding of British history. Extravaganzas like this aren't even about taste. Like junk food, they're a great treat as long as you don't dedicate your life around them. Simon Rattle and the LSO (odd combination) let their hair down. Gosh, doesn't "real" music sound good in comparison.  But it was poignant that the NHS workers had  given so much of their time gratis, when their jobs are threatened because of cuts. No matter, everyone else volunteers, and the sponsors make profits. 

The real Olympics started when the athletes marched in. Marching behind flags always bugs me, even when the ostensible goal is co-operation. But look at the faces of these athletes. They are young, mostly non-intellectual and non-political. For them it's the biggest moment in their lives because they feel they are part oif something greater than themselves. Those who come from poor countries, without the huge machinery of state support, I admire most because they have a dream. The IOC uses them to justify its existence, though it would do lots more for sport if it used its resources in ground level support in developing nations than in a mega-advertisng beanfeast.

Nobody seemed to notice why the Ghanaians were wearing  black and red (Ghanaian colours of mourning) instead of kente finery. Their president has just died, a man almost universally admired for his decency, honour and high ideals.  He was proof that genuinely good people can rise above the shabby scams that characterize politics the world over. His death is a loss to all of us, not just to Ghana. So when the cameras turned to Daniel Barenboim, it felt like valediction. The Olympic ideal has been horribly, disgracefuly corrupted, but moments like these remind us of what could be. The Opening Ceremony was huge fun, but doesn't change the fact that there's a lot wrong with the IOC mentality. Peddling McDonald's and Coca-Cola doies nothing for health and fitness, and contradicts the idea that all nations are equal.




Friday, 27 July 2012

Boulez Le marteau sans maître Prom 17

Pierre Boulez Le marteau sans maître is as important as  Stravinsky's Rite of Spring and Schoenberg's Pierrot Lunaire, said conductor François-Xavier Roth, who conducted it with members of the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra in Prom 17. Ironically, though Daniel Barenboim's Proms series features Beethoven, its greatest achievement long term may be in bringing Boulez to the mainstream. Barenboim is a man of courage and principle. He's confronted social injustice, and now he's challenging musical prejudice.

Boulez's Le marteau sans maître is a work for voice, though the singer (Hilary Summers) sings in only four of the nine segments. The work is a kind of meta-song. "Whereas Pierrot Lunaire is a theatre piece with instrumental accompaniment, the voice always prepondering" said Boulez in an analysis of the piece,  "Le marteau sans maître stems from the cell of a poem which is eventually absorbed in toto". In his early youth, Boulez was drawn to the poetry of René Char and wrote three cycles based on Char's work.  Le marteau sans maître  is thus crucial to any understanding of Boulez's career.

Char was a surrealist. In his poetry, images are compressed, as if by homeopathic distillation. The poet's brief phrases don't reveal meaning in the usual sense, but force the reader to respond intuitively. "Sudddenly", said Boulez, "You recognize yourself.... the illuminating paragraph seems simultaneously  to take possession of you, and to increase your potential, your grasp and your power beyond anything you had dreamed possible".

In Le marteau sans maître, Char's words are crystallized still further so their very relationship with obvious meaning  dissolves into the music itself,  like a droplet spreading concentric cirles in a pool of water. (Notice the limpid "water" imagery in the music). Words are used for musical quality, such as alliteration, and for emphasis. Boulez specifies that the singer is not a soloist. She sits with the ensemble, so the flow between players is uninterrupted. At the end, she intones abstract sound, almost the sound of body rhythms, and the flute (Guy Eshed) sings on her behalf, as had the viola (Ori Kam) before. It's significant that Char was anti-fascist long before the German occupation. On a very deep level, Boulez is reiterating Char's beliefs in the value of the individual against the mass. He uses a strict, almost mathematical structure of three internal cycles within the nine pieces and other more subtle interrelationships, but from this springs great freedom. Formality and ritual, but not repressive. Hence, the hammer without a master.

Yet how that "hammer" is wielded ! Instead of blasts of  masssed brass and percussion, the "aural violence" of the orchestral palette, Boulez uses a small ensemble, where instruments are carefully balanced in terms of pitch and timbre. Even lines are short, traceries of individual notes rather than full tutti.  Nor does he demand Lachenmann-esque distortions. These players aren't there to show off, but to co-operate. Boulez also employs instruments that suggest, but don't copy, instruments from non-western cultures. The guitar (Caroline Delume), suggesting the Japanese koto, xylomarimba (Adrian Salloum) and vibraphone (Pedro Manuel Torrejon Gonzales) suggesting gamelan and the African balafon. They exist, not as exotics, because they can express the non-dogmatic nature of the piece and its sparkling fragments, merrily moving together.  Even the percussion (Noya Schleien) employs no heavy timpani but a gong, maracas, bongos. On this occsasion I was struck by how Le marteau sans maître picks up on Messiaen's concepts. In a dawn chorus, many birds sing, but each is individual, and an astute listener can pick them out. In many ways Le marteau sans maître is also a precursor of Messiaen's Sept Haïkaï (read more here).

By choosing to showcase Le marteau sans maître in this Proms series, Barenboim is again making an extra-musical statement. This piece gives the musicians much more room to engage than the more complex Dérive 2 at the start of the series (more here) and it much more suited to their strengths.  Performance is a journey not an end in itself, as  a deep reading of this piece might suggest. François-Xavier Roth is a charismatic, slightly eccentric personality (in the best creative sense). He's sensitive to Boulez's idiom, and his rapport with the players was good. In  Le marteau sans maître, everyone's a player if they're listening properly. 

Please see my other posts on Pierre Boilez