Fragments of                Venice (4) :  Nono,                 La Lontananza nostalgica utopia futura Irvine Arditti                (violin), André Richard (sound projection)  Queen Elizabeth Hall,                London, 31.10.2007(AO)
         
         
            La Lontananza                is in many ways the quintessential expression of Nono’s                brilliance.  It’s more than “just” music, it’s a conceptual                innovation which makes us rethink the very nature of music.  For                Luigi Nono, music grew from life, and enhanced life and similarly                art didn’t need to be confined to any specific conventions. Form                was just a “construct” to help frame ideas conveniently because                 the spirit of art lies beyond that, free and limitless as the                creative impulse.  Too much is often made of Nono’s “political”                work, which so many of his contemporaries, like Henze and Berio                 also  pursued but his real genius lies in pieces like this, which                stretch the very spirit of art.
         
            The South Bank Nono series wasn’t subtitled “Fragments of Venice”                for nothing.  Entire programmes were devoted to Monteverdi and the                baroque masters for a very good reason.  As a young man, Nono                spent a lot of time in the many churches in Venice, staying for                 hours in their cool interiors.  This  was a completely different                world from the hot, noisy streets outside with their endless                bustle where Nono would have heard music performed with reverence,                and in an atmosphere conducive to inner reflection. He learned                things like polyphony, freedom of expression within ensemble, and                the subservience of elements like text to overall meaning.  More                fundamentally, what he absorbed was the idea that music isn’t a                fixed, rigid commodity but a human experience that draws from many                sources, and has more possibilities than we can imagine. It’s no                surprise then, that so many cutting edge composers today, like                Ferneyhough, draw inspiration from the baroque, just as Nono did.
         
            La Lontananza                is performed in darkness, as if in an ancient, unlit and unheated                church.  This stills the mind, the better that we can focus on                contemplation, free of external distractions.  The first sounds we                hear come from behind a screen, “masked” as it were – another                aspect of the intriguing ambiguity that is so much part of the                magic of Venice.  It is only when Irvine Arditti quietly                materialises at the side of the screen that you realise that the                violin you’re hearing exists not in “reality” but on a recording,                forcing the listener to ask, 'What is reality ? What is illusion ?                ' and ' Why ? '  which is even more pertinent.
         
            In a church, what you hear is literally shaped by space. In the                nave, you’ll hear certain resonances not quite so clear in the                wings.  Even the height of the roof impacts on the way things                sound.  Yet all are part of the whole experience.  Thus Nono has                the violinist moving from place to place in the auditorium.                 Processions, and movement, are part of music in many cultures, not                just in Christianity, but something we’ve lost in the                fixed-platform approach that has dominated western music for the                last 300 years. Thus Arditti makes a progress round the hall,                playing at different stands. At first it seems to matter “where”                he’s playing, but as the music unfolds, that focus no longer seems                important.  What impresses more is the seamless, surround sound                quality of the experience. Gradually it no longer matters what is                being played live and what’s recorded, for the  human violinist                blends with the electronic version of himself on tape with such                seamlessness that reality itself blurs once more. Again, we have                the image of Venice, half built on water, half on land, and of                horizons where sea blends into sky.
         
            La Lontananza                has a sub title, “madrigale per più ‘caminantes’ con Gideon                Kremer”. The different positions  that Arditti plays in aren’t                just for acoustic completeness, but reflect subtle progressions in                the music itself.  For Nono, the idea of movement, of “travelling”                is fundamental.  His music “goes somewhere” and is open ended.                 The theme of journeying recurs in works like Hay no caminar                which itself exists in two versions, one growing out of the                other.  That title refers to an inscription Nono spotted in an old                building. “Caminantes,                no hay caminos, hay que caminar”. It means “Travellers, there are                no roads, but we travel on.”  The South Bank series wisely                presented Hay no Caminar twice, first in its                semi-orchestral version with the London Sinfonietta, and then in                the version for two violins, before which Arditti led a                masterclass.  Arditti had  studied the piece with Nono himself, so                his insights were fascinating.  He explained the significance of                minute details so lucidly that even non-string players could                appreciate what he meant.
         
            This                fascination with journeys connects to something quite fundamental                in Nono’s music.  He’s an explorer, seeking new direction and                means of expression.  The “journeying” also fills a spiritual                purpose.  Nowadays, we expect so much  instant-access expertise,                however superficial, that it’s easy to forget that in many                cultures, the path to wisdom is through humble learning and                experience.   La Lontananza is a pilgrimage towards some                undefined goal, a kind of atheist Stations of the Cross. Its quiet                but firm traverse is a kind of meditation, making us listen                patiently and examine why.
         
            A friend who did a lot of                the theoretical maths that’s behind modern sound technology used                to say that our ideas of “mono” and “stereo” were hopelessly                primitive, because sound is ambient, coming at us from all                sources, and at all levels. It’s our brains that filter and                process what we “hear” whatever the sound sources. It’s not                surface 'noise' that makes music, but something altogether more                elusive.  Everything goes into the experience.  Thus, if during                this performance, we heard the sounds of workmen outside the                auditorium, and coughs from the audience, it wasn’t a problem                because this music functioned on many levels.  Remember Nono,                sitting in a church while a different world revolved around                outside.
         
            Each performance of this work is unique as it’s shaped by the                spatial and acoustic properties of wherever it’s played. A church                is a purpose-built “performance space” because its design and                ornamentation extend the impact of the music.  Even the cruciform                shape is symbolic. The Latin Mass could be like total theatre,                conveying meaning in many levels, so even if the actual words were                in an alien language, the impact still came through. Architecture                shapes sound. In a church, high vaulted ceilings make sound echo,                and what you hear in the wings is different from what you hear in                the nave.  Yet it’s all part of the same “whole”, whatever the                angle from which it’s heard.  Nono’s use of the entire performance                space thus breaks rigid boundaries of sound projection and creates                a more flexible approach to what music can be. His  use of                 recorded sound and snatches of mechanical sound or taped noises                also expands the panorama of what we hear beyond the confines of                “formal” music. Sound projection becomes an art form in its own                right.  André Richard, who has performed this piece since its                inception, knows how to gauge a venue and its acoustic, and                operates his instrument like a chamber player, sensitive to what’s                happening around him and to his partner, the live soloist.  The                possibilities of creating music in space are still being explored:                just this year, Simon Bainbridge premiered two pieces on this                theme, Music Sound Reflection and Diptych, which                incidentally was inspired by Venice.
         
            Arditti’s                violin is clearly venerable, for its tone is lusciously rich and                resonant – even with a broken string.  It would sound exquisite in                any music, yet here he manages to coax beautiful new sounds which                its maker might not have imagined.  Here we heard Arditti, in                music that’s still state of the art,   yet his instrument would                have been played by many other great virtuosos in their time and                  hopefully, it will serve other musicians in centuries to come.                 The performance juxtaposed past, present and future.  Once again,                the world of the baroque connects to the modern, in parallel just                as    in Venice, traces of the past co-exist with the present.
         
            For Nono, history was important and he was immensely proud of what                Venice had achieved.  By humbly learning from its traditions, he                could continue to build on them, in his own way : there is so much                in La Lontananza that rewards patient “pilgrimage” into its                many depths.
         
            Anne                Ozorio
No comments:
Post a Comment